Finally, here are the vector variations of concept #4:But I went and tried to minimize it further and came down to something closer to a black variation of #6:Here it is in smaller sizes:And white variationsLet me know if you want to proceed with this.
Sounds good, i'll prepare variations on #4. They will be done in vectors so no worries about svgs.Tony, Rodrigo, Mitar, and I like 4.Would you like to develop it further?I'd be willing to create an SVG image of it
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Matej Jan < > wrote:
Here are some of my concepts. Let me know if any go into the right direction and I can create more variations on them.1.<PeerLibraryLogoConcept1.jpeg>2.<PeerLibraryLogoConcept2.jpeg>3.<PeerLibraryLogoConcept3.jpeg>4.<PeerLibraryLogoConcept4.jpeg>5.<PeerLibraryLogoConcept5.jpeg>6.<PeerLibraryLogoConcept6.jpeg>
Hi!
One idea. We could make logo very old school, combine P and L and then
do various ornaments around. :-)
I am just not sure how will this align with our minimalistic design.
Mitar
This is too abstract for me to comment yet. :-) Will leave to others to
comment. :-)
Mitar
I dig the ASCII is are the edges and vertices just to symbolize the
connectivity?
Yep, I meant to minimally symbolize that annotations are linked with the
publication and with themselves. (In cloudspeak, "interconnectedness.")
-ro
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_mSettings and unsubscription:
http://lists.peerlibrary.org/lists/info/dev
Public archive:
http://lists.peerlibrary.org/lists/arc/dev
Settings and unsubscription:
http://lists.peerlibrary.org/lists/info/dev
Public archive:
http://lists.peerlibrary.org/lists/arc/dev
Settings and unsubscription:
http://lists.peerlibrary.org/lists/info/dev
Public archive:
http://lists.peerlibrary.org/lists/arc/dev
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.